Summit* |
Number of Commitments (n) |
Total Ambition Score (x) |
Total Significance Score (z) |
Weighted Average (x/n) |
Weighted Average (z/n) |
Lyon 1996 |
|||||
1. International Trade |
9 |
14.5 |
47 |
1.611 |
5.222 |
2. Debt Relief |
4 |
7 |
17 |
1.750 |
4.250 |
Denver 1997 |
|||||
1. International Trade |
6 |
1.5 |
17.5 |
0.250 |
2.917 |
2. Debt Relief |
8 |
5.5 |
22.5 |
0.688 |
2.813 |
Birmingham 1998 |
|||||
1. International Trade |
10 |
11.5 |
44.5 |
1.150 |
4.450 |
2. Debt Relief |
3 |
4 |
14 |
1.333 |
4.667 |
Cologne 1999 |
|||||
1. International Trade |
11 |
15 |
56 |
1.364 |
5.091 |
2. Debt Relief |
5 |
10 |
26 |
2.000 |
5.200 |
Issue* |
Number of Commitments (n) |
Weighted Average (x/n) |
Weighted Average (z/n) |
International Trade |
|||
1. Lyon 1996 |
9 |
1.611 |
5.222 |
2. Denver 1997 |
6 |
0.250 |
2.917 |
3. Birmingham 1998 |
10 |
1.150 |
4.450 |
4. Cologne 1999 |
11 |
1.364 |
5.091 |
Total |
36 |
1.089 |
4.520 |
Debt Relief |
|||
1. Lyon 1996 |
4 |
1.750 |
4.250 |
2. Denver 1997 |
8 |
0.688 |
2.813 |
3. Birmingham 1998 |
3 |
1.333 |
4.667 |
4. Cologne 1999 |
5 |
2.000 |
5.200 |
Total |
20 |
1.443 |
4.233 |
* All data is derived from tables 1.1 to 1.4 and tables 2.1 to 2.4
|
This Information System is provided by the University of Toronto Library and the G8 Research Group at the University of Toronto. |
Please send comments to:
g8@utoronto.ca This page was last updated . |