Levels of Ambition* |
Holding/Changing Status Quo (0 or 1) | General/Specific Measure (0 or 1) | Target and Timetable?(0 or 1) | Using/Creating Institutions (0 or 1) | Old/New Agenda (0 or 1) | Score (x/5) |
Lyon 1996 |
||||||
International Trade |
||||||
1. Trade Credibility |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2. LDC Integration |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3. Uruguay Round Compliance |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4. WTO Membership |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1.5 |
5. Uruguay and LDC |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6. Uruguay Round Implementation |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7. WTO Agenda |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8. Market Access |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
9. Customs Procedures |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Average |
1.611 |
|||||
Debt Relief |
||||||
1. ESAF Financing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2. Naples Terms |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3. Access to Development Assistance |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4. Global Partnership for Development |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
Average |
1.750 |
*The terms "Holding/Changing Status Quo", "General/Specific Measure", "Target and Timetable", "Using/Creating Institutions", and "Old/New Agenda" are used to rank the commitments according to their level of ambition based on a 5-level measurement process defined in the encoding manual.
Table 2.1: Levels of Significance: Lyon 1996
Levels of Significance* |
Ambition (x/5) |
Novelty (x/2) |
Timeliness (1 or 0) |
Scope (x/2) |
Score (x/10) |
Lyon 1996 |
|||||
International Trade |
|||||
1. Trade Credibility |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2. LDC Integration |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3. Uruguay Round Compliance |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4. WTO Membership |
1.5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6.5 |
5. Uruguay and LDC |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
6. Uruguay Round Implementation |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
7. WTO Agenda |
2.5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
7.5 |
8. Market Access |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
9. Customs Procedures |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
Average |
5.222 |
||||
Debt Relief |
|||||
1. ESAF Financing |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2. Naples Terms |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
3. Access to Development Assistance |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
4. Global Partnership for Development |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
Average |
4.250 |
*The terms "Ambition", "Novelty", "Timeliness", and "Scope" are used to rank the commitments according to their level of significance based on a multi-level measurement process defined in the encoding manual.
|
This Information System is provided by the University of Toronto Library and the G8 Research Group at the University of Toronto. |
Please send comments to:
g8@utoronto.ca This page was last updated . |