![]() |
Summits | Meetings | Publications | Research | Search | Home | About the G7 Research Group |
![]() |
| <= Coding Manual | | | Contents | | | Table 2 => |
Compliance with G8 Commitments:
Ascertaining the Degree of Compliance with Summit Debt and International Trade Commitments for Canada and the United States, 1996-1999
Diana Juricevic, G8 Research Group, 2000
| Levels of Ambition* | Holding/Changing Status Quo (0 or 1) | Genal/Specific Measure (0 or 1) | Target and Timetable? (0 or 1) | Using/Creating Institutions (0 or 1) | Old/New Agenda (0 or 1) | Score (x/5) |
| Lyon 1996 | ||||||
| International Trade | ||||||
| 1. Trade Credibility | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2. LDC Integration | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3. Uruguay Round Compliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4. WTO Membership | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 5. Uruguay and LDC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6. Uruguay Round Implementation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 7. WTO Agenda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 8. Market Access | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 9. Customs Procedures | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Average |
1.611 | |||||
| Debt Relief | ||||||
|
1. ESAF Financing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2. Naples Terms |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 | 0 | 3 |
| 3. Access to Development Assistance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4. Global Partnership for Development | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Average | 1.750 | |||||
*The terms "Holding/Changing Status Quo", "General/Specific Measure", "Target and Timetable", "Using/Creating Institutions", and "Old/New Agenda" are used to rank the commitments according to their level of ambition based on a 5-level measurement process defined in the encoding manual.
| Levels of Ambition | Holding/Changing Status Quo (0 or 1) | Genal/Specific Measure (0 or 1) | Target and Timetable? (0 or 1) | Using/Creating Institutions (0 or 1) | Old/New Agenda (0 or 1) | Score (x/5) |
| Denver 1997 | ||||||
| International Trade | ||||||
| 1. WTO Membership | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| 2. Policy Coordination | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. Market Accessibility | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4. LDC Trade Integration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5. Effectiveness of WTO Plan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6. Export Control Regimes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7. WTO Agenda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Average |
0.250 | |||||
| Debt Relief | ||||||
1. Partnership for Development |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2. LDC Political Reforms |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3. Development Aid Review | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. Development Assistance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5. Development Assistance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6. Donor Coordination | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7. UN Development Funds | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8. UN Development Programme | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 |
| Average | 0.688 | |||||
| Levels of Ambition | Holding/Changing Status Quo (0 or 1) | Genal/Specific Measure (0 or 1) | Target and Timetable? (0 or 1) | Using/Creating Institutions (0 or 1) | Old/New Agenda (0 or 1) | Score (x/5) |
| Birmingham 1998 | ||||||
| International Trade | ||||||
| 1. OECD Tax Recommendations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2. Non-OECD Dialogue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. Customs Procedures | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 4. Customs Procedures | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5. World Customs Organization | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6. LLR Initiative | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 7. Regional Market Integration | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| 8. WTO LDC Plan of Action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9. Electronic Commerce | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 10. Electronic Services | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
Average |
1.150 | |||||
| Debt Relief | ||||||
1. Development Assistance |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2. HIPC Initiative |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 | 0 | 3 |
| 3. Export Credit Agencies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Average | 1.333 | |||||
| Levels of Ambition | Holding/Changing Status Quo (0 or 1) | Genal/Specific Measure (0 or 1) | Target and Timetable? (0 or 1) | Using/Creating Institutions (0 or 1) | Old/New Agenda (0 or 1) | Score (x/5) |
| Cologne 1999 | ||||||
| International Trade | ||||||
| 1. Protectionism | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2. WTO Membership | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3. WTO Transparency | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 4. Seattle Round | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 5. WTO Effectiveness | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6. Seattle Round | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 7. Seattle Round | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8. Market Access | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9. Policy Coordination | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 10. Trade Biotechnology | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 11. Trade Development | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Average |
1.364 | |||||
| Debt Relief | ||||||
| 1. LDC Assistance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2. ODA Assistance | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 3. ODA Assistance | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 4. OECD Aid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 5. Koln Debt Initiative | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Average | 2.000 | |||||
| <= Coding Manual | | | Contents | | | Table 2 => |
![]() —
|
This Information System is provided by the University of Toronto Libraries and the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. |
|
Please send comments to:
g7@utoronto.ca This page was last updated March 17, 2026. |
All contents copyright © 2026. University of Toronto unless otherwise stated. All rights reserved.